Re: any way for ORDER BY x to imply NULLS FIRST in 8.3?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: rihad <rihad(at)mail(dot)ru>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: any way for ORDER BY x to imply NULLS FIRST in 8.3?
Date: 2007-11-07 16:39:37
Message-ID: 17880.1194453577@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I put this in the same category as altering the identifier case-folding
>> rules.

> That has much less effect on application portability,

Really? Try counting the number of requests for that in the archives,
vs the number of requests for this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2007-11-07 16:49:40 DB on a ramdisk (was Re: Temporary, In-memory Postgres DB?)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-07 16:11:46 Re: prepared statements suboptimal?