Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Yes, some kind of information "initdb required because column xxx was
> dropped" would be helpful. When scanning the whole beta4-to-beta5 file,
> you'd easily miss the consequence of the 2004-11-05 patch ("remove
> concept of a schema having an associated tablespace").
We do ordinarily say "initdb required" in the changelog message when it
applies. I unaccountably failed to say that in this particular
commit message. Entirely my fault, and I do apologize again.
regards, tom lane