Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Martin Goodson <kaemaril(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
Date: 2017-05-17 21:03:20
Message-ID: 17854.1495055000@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> I could build repmgr against Postgres source and on Ubuntu install of
> EDB Postgres. The issue seems to be a combination of RH and EDB Postgres
> installation. To me it looks like ld is finding
> /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 library before the /opt/PostgreSQL/9.6/lib/
> one.

IIRC this is determined ultimately by /etc/ld.so.conf, but there's
a layer of caching that might be giving trouble. See "man 8 ld.so"
and also "man 8 ldconfig". Looking at the output of "ldconfig -p"
might be informative.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2017-05-17 21:10:57 Re: column names and dollar sign
Previous Message Armand Pirvu (home) 2017-05-17 21:02:24 column names and dollar sign