From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: additional GCC warning flags |
Date: | 2004-10-19 18:37:00 |
Message-ID: | 17853.1098211020@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> There's a better solution: use an approach similar to that used in the
> Linux kernel, which echoes only the object name that's currently being
> compiled.
If I'm reading this correctly, it requires replacing every default build
rule with our own hacked-up version. That's definitely not a recipe for
maintainability, portability, or playing nice with local
customizations... even if I thought the goal was a good idea, which I do
not particularly. If I'm looking at make output it's generally because
I need to fix a problem; not knowing exactly what's being executed
is not going to improve my life.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Reini Urban | 2004-10-19 19:56:36 | Re: pg_regress --temp-keep |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-10-19 18:07:24 | Re: additional GCC warning flags |