Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] wal_checksum = on (default) | off

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Date: 2007-01-11 15:07:13
Message-ID: 17850.1168528033@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> What did you think about protecting against torn writes using id numbers every
> 512 bytes.

Pretty much not happening; or are you volunteering to fix every part of
the system to tolerate injections of inserted data anywhere in a stored
datum?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-11 15:09:16 Re: wal buffers documentation -errata
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2007-01-11 15:05:24 wal buffers documentation -errata

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-11 15:09:16 Re: wal buffers documentation -errata
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2007-01-11 15:05:24 wal buffers documentation -errata