| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs |
| Date: | 2007-12-06 18:18:51 |
| Message-ID: | 17844.1196965131@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I can't see any very good reason for text logs to have different
> content from CSV logs.
Well, if we want to cram all that stuff in there, how shall we do it?
It seems wrong to put all those lines into one text field, but I'm
not sure I want to add six more text fields to the CSV format
either. Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-06 21:02:21 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-06 18:08:43 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-06 18:22:19 | Re: pg_dump and BINARY mode COPY |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-06 18:08:43 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3799: csvlog skips some logs |