Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Wim <wdh(at)belbone(dot)be>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!
Date: 2002-09-18 15:06:10
Message-ID: 17830.1032361570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

Wim <wdh(at)belbone(dot)be> writes:
>> Hm. Are you running in a multibyte character encoding? I had a note
>> that make_greater_string may have problems in the MULTIBYTE case.

> Yes, I compiled postgres with multibyte and ODBC support .

But are you actually *using* the multibyte code? What does "psql -l"
show as the encoding for your database?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurette Cisneros 2002-09-18 20:09:07 index performance question
Previous Message Wim 2002-09-18 15:00:33 Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephane Bortzmeyer 2002-09-18 15:10:58 IPv6 type: a proposed implementation
Previous Message Wim 2002-09-18 15:00:33 Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-09-18 15:11:00 Re: Backend crash (long)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-18 15:03:37 Re: Backend crash (long)

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2002-09-18 18:31:44 Re: [NOVICE] Postgres storing time in strange manner
Previous Message Wim 2002-09-18 15:00:33 Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!