| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) |
| Date: | 2004-10-16 21:19:11 |
| Message-ID: | 178.1097961551@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> This does not show in the OSDL results, which I presume means that their
>> test case is not exercising transaction aborts;
> In the test, one out of every 100 new order transactions is aborted (about 1
> out of 150 transactions overall).
Okay, but that just ensures that any bottlenecks in xact abort will be
down in the noise in this test case ...
In any case, those changes are in CVS now if you want to try them.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-10-16 21:32:14 | Re: Nearing final release? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-16 21:18:26 | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-16 21:36:45 | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-16 21:18:26 | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) |