| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brian McCane <bmccane(at)mccons(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM FULL |
| Date: | 2002-05-12 16:04:50 |
| Message-ID: | 178.1021219490@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Brian McCane <bmccane(at)mccons(dot)net> writes:
> Okay, now I am a little scared. Before I started rebuilding indexes, I
> decided to do the VACUUM FULL thing on all of my tables. On my two most
> referenced tables I am getting:
> ERROR: No one parent tuple was found
Oh, that's interesting. We've gotten sporadic reports of that error
message but no one's ever submitted a reproducible case. Don't suppose
you want to trace through VACUUM FULL with a debugger (or let someone
else do so) to see why it's getting confused?
FWIW, I don't think you need fear data loss. VACUUM FULL has some, um,
quite baroque code to deal with moving update chains as a unit, and it's
just reporting that it couldn't figure out how to move what looked like
a tuple chain.
AFAIK this situation can only occur when there are open transactions
that can still see some already-replaced tuple. So the error would
probably go away if you closed all your open transactions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian McCane | 2002-05-12 17:49:35 | Re: VACUUM FULL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-12 15:46:24 | Re: VACUUM FULL |