| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erol Öz <eroloz(at)esg(dot)com(dot)tr> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why search term results different query plan? |
| Date: | 2001-09-30 02:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | 178.1001817104@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"=?iso-8859-9?B?RXJvbCDWeg==?=" <eroloz(at)esg(dot)com(dot)tr> writes:
> Could anybody give me hint, or reccomend a source about this:
> Please note that two queries are different only in search terms (STAR and
> A). Plan and performane difference between them confused me.
Note the difference in the estimated number of rows matched in
product_t:
> -> Seq Scan on product_t p (cost=0.00..613.41 rows=1 width=94)
> -> Seq Scan on product_t p (cost=0.00..613.41 rows=8321 width=94)
The planner thinks --- not unreasonably, IMHO --- that LIKE '%A%' will
match many more rows than LIKE '%STAR%'. Accordingly, it prepares
different plans for the two cases.
Since you're complaining, I suppose that LIKE '%STAR%' matches many more
rows than random chance would suggest, and so that plan turns out to be
poorly chosen.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-09-30 02:37:24 | Re: Why search term results different query plan? |
| Previous Message | sean-pgsql-general | 2001-09-30 02:08:26 | Re: Encoding passwords |