Re: domain_in performance considerations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: domain_in performance considerations
Date: 2006-04-06 14:12:57
Message-ID: 17798.1144332777@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> This is a shot in the dark, but I remember you commenting awhile back
> that there was a way to register a callback to be called on memory
> context reset or delete.

AFAIR there's no such thing associated with memory contexts per se.
There is one for EStates, but that requires access to an outer EState,
which is exactly what we lack for the other solution too.

I wonder though if we shouldn't invent one for memory contexts. Maybe
even replace the EState-specific shutdown callback with mcontext cleanup
on its query context?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2006-04-06 14:13:47 Re: Windows installer bugs (was: [BUGS] BUG #2374: Installation
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-04-06 13:55:39 Re: domain_in performance considerations