| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Issue with large objects |
| Date: | 2004-12-11 18:27:21 |
| Message-ID: | 17797.1102789641@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc |
"Chris White (cjwhite)" <cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com> writes:
> Also, I found by re-indexing the pg_largeobject table the problem seems to
> have gone away.
Um. That's probably destroyed the evidence :-( ie gotten rid of
whatever weird state you'd gotten the index into. But if you have
any luck reproducing it, I definitely want to know.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-12-11 18:42:02 | Re: pgcrypto module for WINDOWS |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-12-11 18:21:46 | Re: How to temporarily disable referntial integrity? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-12-11 20:13:34 | Re: PostgreSQL + SSL - sun.security.validator.ValidatorException |
| Previous Message | Chris White (cjwhite) | 2004-12-11 17:42:15 | Re: [JDBC] Issue with large objects |