Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock
Date: 1999-12-20 03:13:06
Message-ID: 17780.945659586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> That's what I suspected. But of course LockRelation() doesn't return
>> anything based on whether it succeeded, it just hangs, so it'll take a
>> little more work. Next year ...

I think this would actually have to be implemented inside the lock
manager in order to make it work right.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-12-20 03:26:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-20 02:35:37 Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock