Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, CM Team <cm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial
Date: 2022-05-25 01:44:50
Message-ID: 1777456.1653443090@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-05-25 12:45:21 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> I know we have quite a lot of museum exhibits in the 'farm, in terms
>> of hardare, OS, and tool chain. In some cases, they're probably just
>> forgotten/not on anyone's upgrade radar. If they've shown signs of
>> misbehaving, maybe it's time to figure out if they can be upgraded?

> TBH, I think we should just desupport HPUX.

I think there's going to be a significant die-off of old BF animals
when (if?) we convert over to the meson build system; it's just not
going to be worth the trouble to upgrade those platforms to be able
to run meson and ninja. I'm inclined to wait until that's over and
see what's still standing before we make decisions about officially
desupporting things.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-05-25 01:55:16 Re: Limiting memory allocation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-05-25 01:35:57 Re: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests