From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |
Date: | 2006-08-23 12:24:55 |
Message-ID: | 17753.1156335895@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
> What are these open issues for the updatable views patch you are seeing
> exactly?
Didn't Alvaro list a bunch of issues when he put the patch back up for
comment? I have not looked at it myself yet.
> i see the INSERT...RETURNING stuff as the only "big hurd" at the moment
That's not the fault of the updatable-views patch, but it definitely is
something we need to put some time into :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2006-08-23 12:29:53 | Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2006-08-23 12:11:24 | Re: Question about (lazy) vacuum |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2006-08-23 12:42:47 | plpgsql, return can contains any expression |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-23 12:08:24 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY view |