Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-02-13 20:06:03
Message-ID: 17746.1234555563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe the argument to PQinitSSLExtended should be a bit mask, making
> this version more extendable ... PG_INITSSL, PG_INITCRYPTO?

+1 for thinking ahead to the next time, but is a bit mask the right thing?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-02-13 20:10:44 Re: The science of optimization in practical terms?
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2009-02-13 19:59:31 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf