| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Static snapshot data |
| Date: | 2003-05-23 18:53:24 |
| Message-ID: | 17743.1053716004@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
> All I'm saying is if we can have
> (1) a simple version with some restrictions for 7.4 and
> SERIALIZABLE subtransactions for 7.5 or
> (2) nothing for 7.4 and everything for 7.5
> I'd rather have (1); as long as we don't cause incompatibilities, of
> course.
I don't object to that plan. The scenario I was sketching also requires
the ability to catch errors from subtransactions in plpgsql, which is
something not likely to be there in the first cut either. I'm just
saying not to paint yourself into a corner.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-23 19:13:36 | Plan B for log rotation support: borrow Apache code |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-05-23 18:49:25 | Re: Static snapshot data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-23 19:31:30 | Re: Static snapshot data |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-05-23 18:49:25 | Re: Static snapshot data |