Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Sergey Belyashov <sergey(dot)belyashov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Subject: Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault
Date: 2025-02-18 22:24:06
Message-ID: 1773117.1739917446@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I don't intend 0003 for back-patch, but the rest of this has to go
> back as far as the bug can be observed, which I didn't test yet.

Ah: this bug is new in v17, because neither brininsertcleanup nor
the whole aminsertcleanup infrastructure exist before that.

So that leaves us with a question of whether 0004 should be
back-patched any further than v17. There's some attraction
to doing so to keep the branches in sync; but there's already
quite a lot of cross-branch churn in worker.c, so on the whole
I'm inclined to just do v17.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2025-02-19 02:28:42 Re: BUG #18806: When enable_rartitionwise_join is set to ON, the database shuts down abnormally
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2025-02-18 20:52:08 Re: Inconsistency of timezones in postgresql

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-02-18 22:28:49 Re: per backend WAL statistics
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-02-18 22:02:25 Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.