Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT
Date: 2001-08-14 15:16:57
Message-ID: 17715.997802217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl> writes:
> Does PostgresQL have some way to make update, insert and delete queries
> not return the number of affected rows? I know that in MS SQL one would
> use NOCOUNT for that.

Uh ... why? Seems like a useless anti-feature. Certainly suppressing
the count wouldn't save a noticeable number of cycles.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message newsreader 2001-08-14 15:25:27 I am confused about PointerGetDatum among other things
Previous Message Gregory Wood 2001-08-14 15:11:05 Re: help on delete trigger.