| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Joseph Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, bsdeepu(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? |
| Date: | 2010-02-26 05:55:15 |
| Message-ID: | 17711.1267163715@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> Now, you've reminded me of something: That one or more versions of tar have trouble with very long file/directory names
> I've run into this with one of the source trees we've been working in - was it here in PostgreSQL? Could this be a culprit?
I believe we dealt with that, by renaming some files shorter. It wasn't
anywhere near the docs files anyway.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Andersen | 2010-02-26 11:41:51 | BUG #5347: initdb does not work when a data directory has been deleted |
| Previous Message | Lou Picciano | 2010-02-26 05:47:48 | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? |