From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations |
Date: | 2005-06-01 19:03:48 |
Message-ID: | 17708.1117652628@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> It occurs to me that at least on some OSes the WAL logs are being synced with
> O_SYNC or its ilk. In those cases the writes should be guaranteed to be
> written out in the order postgres wrote them. So if the tail end of the WAL
> entry is there (is there any sort of footer?) then the entire entry must be
> there. In that case is there any need to calculate the CRC at all?
Sure. How else do you know that the entry is all there *and is valid*?
There's no "footer", and if there were it might still be garbage (eg
left over from a prior cycle).
Also, I doubt that O_SYNC could do anything to guarantee write order of
the individual sectors within a page.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-06-01 19:11:18 | Re: Google's Summer of Code ... |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-06-01 18:56:22 | Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations |