Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
Subject: Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local
Date: 2023-01-03 15:48:39
Message-ID: 1770491.1672760919@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-01-02 15:46:36 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I haven't seen any problems in HEAD, so I'm working on backpatching.

> And done.

It occurs to me that we should now be able to drop configure's
probe for -Wno-compound-token-split-by-macro, since that was only
needed to suppress warnings in the Perl headers. Won't save much
of course, but every test we can get rid of is worth doing IMO.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-03 15:54:31 Re: Is OpenSSL AES-NI not available in pgcrypto?
Previous Message Sascha Kuhl 2023-01-03 15:45:16 Re: Stack overflow issue