Re: PG Sharding

> On Jan 29, 2018, at 09:34 , Matej <gmatej(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone.
>
> We are looking at a rather large fin-tech installation. But as scalability requirements are high we look at sharding of-course.
>
> I have looked at many sources for Postgresql sharding, but we are a little confused as to shared with schema or databases or both.
>
>
> So far our understanding:
>
> SCHEMA.
>
> PROS:
> - seems native to PG
> - backup seems easier
> - connection pooling seems easier, as you can use same connection between shard.
>
> CONS:
> - schema changes seems litlle more complicated
> - heard of backup and maintenance problems
> - also some caching problems.
>
> DATABASE:
>
> PROS:
> - schema changes litlle easier
> - backup and administration seems more robust
>
> CONS:
> - heard of vacuum problems
> - connection pooling is hard, as 100 shards would mean 100 pools
>
>
> So what is actually the right approach? If anyone could shed some light on my issue.

From your description it seems your requirement is more of multi tenancy in a non distributed env, rather than distributed Sharding env.