| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby utility and administrator functions |
| Date: | 2008-10-21 12:10:00 |
| Message-ID: | 17699.1224591000@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 18:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In any case, do not use the wrong return type for the definition you're
>> implementing.
> err...Why would anyone do that?
That's what I wanted to know ;-). If these functions are really going
to return txid, then they should be named to reflect that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-21 14:15:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby utility and administrator functions |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT | 2008-10-21 07:44:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby utility and administrator functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias Karlsson | 2008-10-21 12:31:53 | Re: How best to implement a multi-table constraint? |
| Previous Message | Rob Richardson | 2008-10-21 12:07:31 | Varchar vs varchar(64) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-21 12:31:54 | Re: automatic parser generation for ecpg |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2008-10-21 11:52:17 | Re: SE-PostgreSQL wiki updates, but ... |