From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A couple of gripes about the gettext plurals patch |
Date: | 2009-05-27 20:47:18 |
Message-ID: | 17698.1243457238@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009 21:05:29 Tom Lane wrote:
>> I experimented with this and found that indeed both format strings are
>> checked ... if you have a reasonably recent libintl.h AND you have
>> specified --enable-nls. Otherwise it all goes to heck, apparently
>> because the compiler doesn't try to look through our substitute
>> definition
>>
>> #define ngettext(s,p,n) ((n) == 1 ? (s) : (p))
> I can't reproduce that. Do you have a concrete example? Different compiler
> versions, perhaps?
Hmm, I was experimenting with Fedora 10's gcc (4.3.2) ... what are you
testing?
I don't have the test case anymore but will see if I can reconstruct it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-05-27 20:49:42 | Re: search_path vs extensions |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-05-27 20:34:36 | User-facing aspects of serializable transactions |