Res: How can I look at a recursive table dependency tree?

From: paulo matadr <saddoness(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Res: How can I look at a recursive table dependency tree?
Date: 2009-01-19 18:23:10
Message-ID: 176666.25855.qm@web52512.mail.re2.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In postgresql 8.2 ,how find it?

________________________________
De: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Para: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2009 14:36:46
Assunto: Re: [GENERAL] How can I look at a recursive table dependency tree?

Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:41:12 +0000
> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:19:51 +0000
>>> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Igor Katson wrote:
>>>>> Is there a way to watch all dependencies recursively without
>>>>> doing a drop?
>>>> BEGIN;
>>>> DROP CASCADE...
>>>> -- check things
>>>> ROLLBACK;
>>> Isn't it going to be a pretty expensive way to see?
>
>> Not necessarily - you're not likely to have a lot of concurrency
>> on a backup database. And we are all testing this sort of stuff on
>> a backup database, aren't we?
>
> Isn't it going to be expensive even if there is no concurrency?

Not particularly. If you DELETE a lot of rows that can be expensive, but
dropping a table doesn't need to track each record individually.

> mvcc should be pretty efficient to rollback transactions but... well
> it should have a cost anyway... and you add deleting to rolling
> back, not just traversing some schema somehow.

No deletion, just removes the table (and its indexes) from catalogues
and deletes the relevant file(s) on commit.

> Surely recursively traversing a schema may be expensive in termos of
> programming time if there is no pre-build function.

Well, it shouldn't take more than an hour or so to write and test a
function. Never done so myself, since I tend to know what my schemas
look like.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Faheem Mitha 2009-01-19 18:40:13 Re: array_agg for 8.3
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2009-01-19 17:36:46 Re: How can I look at a recursive table dependency tree?