Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*))

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Will LaShell <will(at)lashell(dot)net>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*))
Date: 2003-11-18 07:34:52
Message-ID: 17646.1069140892@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
>> It would be even better to have now() that returns the time current
>> transaction is COMMITted as this is the time other backend become aware
>> of it ;)

> True, but implementing that would be very hard.

Son, that was a *joke* ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2003-11-18 07:36:07 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-11-18 06:59:39 Re: Background writer process

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryszard Lach 2003-11-18 09:16:46 Re: duration logging setting in 7.4
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 02:37:07 Re: duration logging setting in 7.4