Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Date: 2007-10-10 15:47:15
Message-ID: 17624.1192031235@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

"Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> IMHO the core operations are already as stable as PostgreSQL use
> of MVCC, as the module just exports backend internal state...

Well, it exports backend internal state that did not exist before 8.2
(ie, XID epoch). So it doesn't seem all that set in stone to me.

> Another thing can can be done is more compact representation for
> txid_snapshot type, but that also won't affect core operation.

That's another thing that's likely to become very much harder to change
once it's in core. People keep threatening to produce a working
in-place-upgrade process, and once that's reality the on-disk
representation of core types is going to be hard to change.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-10-10 15:50:53 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-10-10 15:41:57 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-10-10 15:50:53 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-10-10 15:41:57 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review