Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brook Milligan <brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error
Date: 1999-05-11 23:01:25
Message-ID: 17618.926463685@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> Isn't the correct solution to have the Makefile contain a rule that

> Yes, that is what we were saying.

The problem is simply a matter of failing to expand indirect references
in that substitution process. I just committed a fix.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-11 23:26:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-11 22:04:40 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error