Re: BUG #17151: A SEGV in optimizer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: 253540651(at)qq(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17151: A SEGV in optimizer
Date: 2021-08-19 16:13:31
Message-ID: 1760361.1629389611@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 8:24 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> We probably need some regression test cases added (I wonder whether
>> FOR UPDATE in rule actions is covered at all ATM). Otherwise
>> I feel like this is OK to commit.

> +1 for adding at least two queries reported on this thread to regression tests.

Right, pushed with some test cases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message anil bommareddy 2021-08-20 06:32:11 Re: BUG #17153: tpch-hammerdb-Query21
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-08-19 14:34:54 Re: BUG #17053: Memory corruption in parser on prepared query reuse