From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Foster, Stephen" <stephenlfoster(at)comcast(dot)net> |
Cc: | "'Michael Fuhr'" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Looking for information on PostgreSQL Stored Procedures |
Date: | 2005-12-11 18:08:06 |
Message-ID: | 17602.1134324486@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
"Foster, Stephen" <stephenlfoster(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> WHILE (--Lost on variable name for end of query;
> EmptyQueryResponse <> 0? --)
WHILE FOUND
LOOP
...
END LOOP
Although as Michael mentioned, this is all the hard way; any experienced
plpgsql programmer would forget the cursor entirely and just write a
FOR-loop.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tobias Bußmann | 2005-12-11 20:16:15 | Re: Winbashing |
Previous Message | Foster, Stephen | 2005-12-11 18:07:26 | Re: [SQL] Looking for information on PostgreSQL Stored Procedures |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Premsun Choltanwanich | 2005-12-13 08:54:49 | lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 |
Previous Message | Foster, Stephen | 2005-12-11 18:07:26 | Re: [SQL] Looking for information on PostgreSQL Stored Procedures |