From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marcus Andree S(dot) Magalhaes" <marcus(dot)magalhaes(at)vlinfo(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | shannyconsulting(at)earthlink(dot)net, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: disabling seq scans |
Date: | 2004-04-02 04:16:21 |
Message-ID: | 17602.1080879381@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
"Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes" <marcus(dot)magalhaes(at)vlinfo(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> But, since we're using pooled connections, we must be extra
> careful and ensure all connections have the enable_seqscan
> reset to its default.
If you are concerned about failing to reset parameters, use "SET LOCAL
foo" instead of plain "SET foo" (and of course, do this inside a
transaction block). With the LOCAL option the parameter is guaranteed
to be reset at transaction end.
> Do the pooling system resets the "enable_seqscan" variable
> when the connections are delivered to the clients or we
> *must* do it ourselves?
I think it is reasonable to expect a pooling system to deliver you a
fresh transaction. It is not reasonable to expect it to go and issue
explicit SET commands to undo things you've done.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-04-02 06:55:04 | Re: patch: enforce the requirements for scrollable resultsets |
Previous Message | Sanjay Singh | 2004-04-02 03:42:59 | Un-register |