| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: User-Friendly TimeZone List |
| Date: | 2007-08-16 05:28:11 |
| Message-ID: | 17581.1187242091@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net> writes:
> 1. The timezone list there isn't exactly user friendly, there are many
> Etc/* timezones there, as well as others that would be potentially
> confusing for users who are trying to select the timezone they are in.
Feel free to filter things you don't think are popular. I'd be inclined
to delete Etc/ posix/ and right/ (the latter two only show up on some
platforms). Another idea is to not show anything more than an hour or
two off from where you think the user is.
> 2. If a timezone is removed from the list for whatever reason, then the
> system will be left with users who have selected a timezone that is no
> longer a valid choice in the list.
I think that's pretty unlikely to happen, unless you switch to a
different platform.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-16 05:31:46 | Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE performance costs? alternatives? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-16 05:21:43 | Re: Deadlocks caused by a foreign key constraint |