Re: Compare rows

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compare rows
Date: 2003-10-10 16:44:21
Message-ID: 1756cdfe0672f1cab443627e1fd7a4b3@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> The most efficient way for you to store data would be like this:
> main table
> id address
> 3 67.92
> 7 69.5
>
> child table
> id value_type value
> 3 uptime 0.3
> 3 memory 37
> 7 uptime 1.1
> 7 memory 15

Actually, a more efficient* way is this:

value table
vid value_name
1 uptime
2 memory

child table
id vid value
3 1 0.3
3 2 37
7 1 1.1
7 2 15

* Still not necessarily the *most* efficient, depending on how the
values are distributed, but it sure beats storing "uptime" over
and over again. :)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200310101243
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE/huHxvJuQZxSWSsgRAiMNAKD4kQCwdv3fXyEFUu64mymtf567dwCcCKd5
ZzJaV7wjfs00DBT62bVpHhs=
=32b8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2003-10-10 16:55:42 Re: PostgreSQL Scalable ?
Previous Message Bill Moran 2003-10-10 16:42:04 Re: One or more processor ?