Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors
Date: 2014-01-21 21:53:59
Message-ID: 17555.1390341239@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The only real argument for the message:

> LOG: configuration file "/home/thom/Development/data/postgresql.conf"
> contains errors; unaffected changes were applied

> ...is that somebody might think that the presence of a single error
> caused all the changes to be ignored. And there's a good reason they
> might think that: we used to do it that way. But on the flip side, if
> we emitted a LOG or WARNING message every time the user did something
> that works in a way incompatible with previous releases, we'd go
> insane. So I think the argument for just dumping that message
> altogether is actually pretty good.

Hm. I don't recall what the arguments were for adding that message,
but you have a point that it might have served its purpose by now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2014-01-21 22:01:42 Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-21 21:51:10 Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks)