Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Yeah, I think that might work if I understand it correctly.
> Assuming I would be able to prepare, and bind all the parameters, and
> the OUT parameters
> would be ignored.
> FWIW, I proposed adding to the protocol, not modifying the existing
> messages, so it would be backward compatible and not break existing
> clients.
What I have in mind shouldn't break any existing clients either.
There is no use for VOID parameter symbols at the moment, so assigning
a special behavior to them won't break any existing code.
regards, tom lane