Re: [PATCH] Add two-arg for of current_setting(NAME, FALLBACK)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add two-arg for of current_setting(NAME, FALLBACK)
Date: 2017-11-02 13:12:12
Message-ID: 17496ef9-4e3e-4e5b-1514-5406f5a41da2@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/1/17 14:02, Nico Williams wrote:
> There already _is_ a two-argument form of current_setting() that yours
> somewhat conflicts with:
>
> current_setting(setting_name [, missing_ok ])
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-admin.html
>
> I often use
>
> coalesce(current_setting(setting_name, true), default_value_here)
>
> as an implementation of current_setting() with a default value.

That appears to address this use case then. Do we need the new proposed
variant still?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2017-11-02 13:33:46 Re: Client Connection redirection support for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-02 13:11:21 Re: list of credits for release notes