From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Richard J Kuhns <rjk(at)grauel(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question about databases in alternate locations... |
Date: | 2000-05-17 16:35:14 |
Message-ID: | 17483.958581314@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Richard J Kuhns <rjk(at)grauel(dot)com> writes:
> Now for the question. What's the reason for using this method, as opposed
> to using, say, a system catalog to hold the valid locations? Historical?
> Having to stop and restart the backend so it can re-read its environment
> seems kind of archaic.
Well, there'd be a certain amount of circularity in consulting a table
to find out where you can find tables, no? ;-) But you're right, the
environment-variable mechanism is pretty grotty. There's been a great
deal of discussion already in pg-hackers about how to clean up this
and related issues; suggest you consult the archives if you want to get
involved with fixing it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Condon | 2000-05-17 16:57:05 | Re: PostgreSQL General Digest V1 #156 |
Previous Message | Michael S. Kelly | 2000-05-17 16:18:49 | RE: 7.0 psql, readline and history. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-17 16:45:03 | Re: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-17 16:34:32 | Ouch .. VACUUM *is* killer ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Patrick Robin | 2000-05-17 17:13:20 | pg_dump return failed sanity check |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-17 15:27:46 | Re: Question about databases in alternate locations... |