Re: Question about databases in alternate locations...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Richard J Kuhns <rjk(at)grauel(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about databases in alternate locations...
Date: 2000-05-17 16:35:14
Message-ID: 17483.958581314@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Richard J Kuhns <rjk(at)grauel(dot)com> writes:
> Now for the question. What's the reason for using this method, as opposed
> to using, say, a system catalog to hold the valid locations? Historical?
> Having to stop and restart the backend so it can re-read its environment
> seems kind of archaic.

Well, there'd be a certain amount of circularity in consulting a table
to find out where you can find tables, no? ;-) But you're right, the
environment-variable mechanism is pretty grotty. There's been a great
deal of discussion already in pg-hackers about how to clean up this
and related issues; suggest you consult the archives if you want to get
involved with fixing it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Condon 2000-05-17 16:57:05 Re: PostgreSQL General Digest V1 #156
Previous Message Michael S. Kelly 2000-05-17 16:18:49 RE: 7.0 psql, readline and history.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-17 16:45:03 Re: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-17 16:34:32 Ouch .. VACUUM *is* killer ...

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Robin 2000-05-17 17:13:20 pg_dump return failed sanity check
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-17 15:27:46 Re: Question about databases in alternate locations...