| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: race condition in pgplsql call handler? |
| Date: | 2007-05-11 13:04:19 |
| Message-ID: | 17475.1178888659@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> I'm looking into PG/PLSql code and following code in
> plpgsql_call_handler looks strange:
> /* Find or compile the function */
> func = plpgsql_compile(fcinfo, false);
> /* Mark the function as busy, so it can't be deleted from under
> us */
> func->use_count++;
> I don't have deep knowledge about this part of code. But what happen if
> in parallel execution "func" will be deleted between these two lines?
This is not a race condition because the backend is single-threaded.
(Hint: what it actually means by "function" is "the plpgsql function
cache entry I just found or built".)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-05-11 13:39:50 | Re: race condition in pgplsql call handler? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-11 11:41:36 | Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes |