Re: fix use of posix_fadvise in xlog.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix use of posix_fadvise in xlog.c
Date: 2010-06-10 15:44:02
Message-ID: 17458.1276184642@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> In a steady-state situation new WAL files are not created very often
> because we recycle old ones, so it probably doesn't make much difference.

Yeah. We really don't worry too much about the performance of the
new-WAL-file-creation code path because of this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2010-06-10 15:44:16 Re: Error with GIT Repository
Previous Message Max Williams 2010-06-10 15:40:06 Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?