Re: Why is checkpoint so costly?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is checkpoint so costly?
Date: 2005-06-21 21:16:39
Message-ID: 17436.1119388599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Can we break down everything that happens during a checkpoint so that we
> can see where this huge cost is coming from? Checkpointing should be
> limited to fsyncing to disk and marking WAL files as recyclable, but there
> seems to be something more.

I already asked you to measure the thing I think is the likely candidate
(to wit, dumping full page images into WAL).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-06-21 21:22:54 pg_terminate_backend idea
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-21 21:14:44 Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters