Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-19 00:14:49
Message-ID: 17415.995501689@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> I don't love current OIDs. However they have lived in PostgreSQL's
> world too long and few people have pointed out that there's no magic
> around OIDs. I agree to change OIDs to be per class but strongly
> object to let OIDs optional.

Uh ... what? I don't follow what you are proposing here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Myers 2001-07-19 00:21:18 Re: MySQL Gemini code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-19 00:13:33 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)