Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Date: 2007-07-23 18:22:25
Message-ID: 1741.1185214945@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> OK, 20ms it is then. Here is a patch. I am taking the liberty to also
> lower the vacuum and analyze threshold default values to 50, per
> previous discussion.

Patch probably needs to touch docs (config.sgml at least) too?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cody Bennett 2007-07-23 18:25:09 supporting 0x00 from client Unicode JDBC
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-23 17:54:32 Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3