Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The odds of that syntax getting accepted may not be exactly zero, but
>> they are certainly vanishingly small. I thought we'd agreed that a
>> usable syntax would be like
>> get_employee_salary(12345 AS emp_id, 2001 AS tax_year)
> TODO updated, but I thought "=>" was the Oracle syntax.
So? We don't support Oracle's brain-dead outer join syntax either.
regards, tom lane