Re: Documentation website reading widths

For me that’s col-6. It looks like this:

I think everything fits nicely. Maybe decluttering buttons via visual cues like color or boldness or something else to make them more prominent than the chapter’s text or some redesign would be nice too. But in terms of reading I believe it is much superior

 
>Вторник, 4 февраля 2025, 18:34 +03:00 от Kushal Hada <kushaldeveloper(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 
> 
>On 2/4/25 6:10 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>Hello. As per old Wikipedia’s design, it is hard to read text from a
>>wide screen since it spans like so without any limitations
>Hi Team,
>As a workaround, maybe make the browser window not maximized to take up the full screen?
>For everyone else, continuing on what Daniel suggested can you please try changing the col-11 to something like col-xl-4, col-xl-5, col-xl-6 or something like that and reply with what looks best to you? If there is consensus on which number is good, this could be an easy win. For example,
><div id="pgContentWrap" class="col-11 col-xl-5">
>It looks like we are using bootstrap 4 based on this file name bootstrap-4.4.1.min.css so we can continue to use this col- names. 
>col-xl-* means it will only affect screen sizes wider than 1200px so this way we won't step on the toes of people with narrow screens (I would very much like to keep the current experience when I need to look up something quickly on my phone). 
>I have attached a sample screenshot with this email. Please take a look.
>Action Item: Please reply with your preferred column size (e.g., col-xl-4, col-xl-5, col-xl-6, or any other number between 1 and 12 for Bootstrap) that you think looks best.
> 
>Very respectfully, 
>Kushal
 
 
--
Noob Trall
Отправлено из Почты Mail