Re: currval was (Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? )

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "rob" <rob(at)cabrion(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net
Subject: Re: currval was (Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? )
Date: 2001-01-20 16:51:53
Message-ID: 1739.980009513@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"rob" <rob(at)cabrion(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a correct way to "initialize" currval without incrementing the
> sequence?

No, but for the purpose that was being discussed here, I don't see why
you'd need to. Maybe you should explain the application logic that
seems to require such a thing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Wood 2001-01-20 16:54:46 Re: Re: couple of general questions
Previous Message rob 2001-01-20 16:47:51 currval was (Re: Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? )