I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Date: 2000-01-16 02:03:50
Message-ID: 17389.947988230@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I noticed today that the system drops any "typmod" modifier associated
with a type name being casted to. For example,

regression=# select '1.23456'::numeric(7,2);
?column?
----------
1.23456 --- should be 1.23
(1 row)

regression=# select CAST ('1234567.89' AS numeric(4,1));
?column?
------------
1234567.89 --- should raise a numeric-overflow error
(1 row)

These particular cases can be fixed with a one-line patch, I think,
because there is storage in an A_Const node to hold a reference to
a Typename, which includes typmod. parse_expr.c is just forgetting
to pass the typmod to parser_typecast().

BUT: there isn't any equally simple patch when the value being casted
is not a constant. For instance

select field1 :: numeric(7,2) from table1;

cannot work properly now, because gram.y transforms it into

select numeric(field1) from table;

which (a) drops the typmod and (b) bypasses all of the intelligence
that should be used to determine how to coerce the type.

What I think we need is to add a new parsetree node type that explicitly
represents a CAST operator, and then modify parse_expr.c to transform
that node type into an appropriate function call (or, perhaps, nothing
at all if the source value is already the right type).

Comments?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-16 02:29:18 Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-16 01:38:33 Re: [HACKERS] flex