Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> That's quite possible that there is a fair amount of dead code in there
> because it was originally the header for the lztext datatype, which if
> memory served only existed quietly in one release to support slightly
> larger rewrite rules before it was replaced with TOAST.
Ah, I was wondering how so much of it came to be dead code, but that
explains that. I will pull out whatever's not referenced anymore ---
it looks like there are a couple of subroutines, not just macros,
that we don't need.
regards, tom lane