From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index |
Date: | 2016-12-30 14:27:45 |
Message-ID: | 1736f8be-965b-32cf-6e8d-7778a7b380f5@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/11/2016 12:11 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Jesper,
>
>> Some initial comments.
>>
>> _hash_vacuum_one_page:
>>
>> + END_CRIT_SECTION();
>> + _hash_chgbufaccess(rel, metabuf, HASH_READ, HASH_NOLOCK);
>>
>> The _hash_chgbufaccess() needs a comment.
>>
>> You also need a place where you call pfree for so->killedItems - maybe in
>> hashkillitems().
>
> Thanks for reviewing this patch. I would like to update you that this
> patch has got dependency on a patch for concurrent hash index and WAL
> log in hash index. So, till these two patches for hash index are not
> stable I won't be able to share you a next version of patch for
> supporting microvacuum in hash index.
>
This can be rebased on the WAL v7 patch [1]. In addition to the previous
comments you need to take commit 7819ba into account.
Best regards,
Jesper
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-12-30 14:32:41 | Re: proposal: session server side variables |
Previous Message | Yuriy Zhuravlev | 2016-12-30 14:10:45 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |