From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Date Math |
Date: | 2007-05-07 19:00:23 |
Message-ID: | 17357.1178564423@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> With this setup you will have to use an explicit string-
> date_issued + INTERVAL term|| 'years'. This will involve constructing a
> string and passing it to INTERVAL.
No, that's a truly awful way to do it. The correct way is to use number
times interval multiplication, eg
date_issued + term * '1 year'::interval;
This reduces to not much more than a floating-point multiply, whereas
the other way involves string-forming and string-parsing. Plus you
can easily use whatever multiplier you like, eg '7 days' if weeks
strike your fancy.
It might be that converting those columns to interval is the best
answer, depending on what other processing needs to be done with them.
But if Rich wants to leave them as numbers, the above is the best way
to convert them to intervals on-the-fly.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Kroeger | 2007-05-07 19:03:35 | Re: Slow query and indexes... |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-05-07 18:58:06 | PITR and tar |